The A123 FAQ for Giant Scale and IMAC

Hangtimes Home
Schweizer SGS 2-33
NoBS Batteries "What's the Difference?"
A123 LiFe Rx, Ignition & Turbine Packs
NiMH & NiCad Giant Scale, IMAC Rx, Ignition and Turbine ECU Packs
NiCad & NiMH Sport Rx Packs
Transmitter Packs
Power Tool Packs
Chargers, Switch Kits & Accessories
NiMH/NiCAD Tech Tips & Support FAQ
A123 Batteries FAQ
A123 Setup Guide
Red's R/C Battery Clinic
How to Purchase & Shipping Policy
Contact Us

DSCN7533_resize.JPG
Click Here to Order A123 Packs & Equip

Multi4.jpg
Click to Go to Chargers & Accessories

DSCN7494_resize.jpg
Click Here for the A123 Setup Guide

The A123 FAQ for anti-social cave dwellers (like me) that fly IMAC 3D and Giant Scale

-

For the past 2 ½ years I’ve been watching the deployment and Modelers reactions to this new cell technology all across the hobby.. Electric Flight, RC Cars, and my particular area of interest and expertise.. Commercial/Military RPV’s, Giant Scale Warbirds and 3D IMAC type applications. If your looking for application info and assistance with the pressing questions of what motor pack, controller options and props would work best for your buggy or your electric powered airplanes.. move along. Nothing for you here. For you folks that are looking at this technology to replace the NiCad and NiMH Rx, Servo and ECU packs in your big birds.. your in the right place. I’ll try and hit the high points first, then move into general application and use notes as we progress with this. As with the NiCad and NiMH FAQ I’ve put up on this site, it’ll be a work in progress.

*

First.. what is it?  Well, simply put; this is the iteration of Lithium Technology that won’t burn your shop, plane or house down if you do everything right. Or wrong. In the ‘industry’, these cells are referred to as LiFe PO4 cells.. also called ‘nanophosphate’ or Lithium-Iron… confused yet? Yah; me too. For the sake of sanity and ease of labeling I’ll be calling them what the MFG/Importer calls them.. A123 LiFe, type M1.

*

Ok, now that we’ve identified what we’re talking about, let’s look at what they can do for us Giants and Big 3D fliers... Again, for ease of digestibility, I’ll compare them in broad terms to the technologies we’re flying now and try and keep the relationships on a level we can all relate to without finger paintings.

*

Q: How do these compare to the Sub-C NiCad’s I’ve been using for the last 3 decades?

*

Ok, this one will need some breakdown.. first; size and weight. Dimensionally, the cell is FULL C in diameter, and about half again as tall as a Full C cell.. and that’s bigger than Sub-C Nicads like the 2400 Sanyo. On the other hand, they’re verylight.. and only two cells are required to build up an Rx or Ignition pack. Next, weight savings on the plane usually amounts to half the weight of a sub-c NiCad and about the same rated capacity. Pay attention to that rated capacity bit..  I’ll get into that a bit later.

*

Q: Are they as dependable as NiCads?

*

A dependability comparison against NiCad’s has been the Achilles Heel of Lithium technologies… until now. Folks, these cells astonish me.. and this is the first cell I’ve ever seen that will actually outlast in calendar life AND duty cycles the venerable Sub-C NiCads.

*

Right along with dependability also rides the pressing question of our use of these cells in Giants and 3D birds.. the performance under load. Here, they again out perform NiCad’s. Yes, they are stable. Yes, they are capable of handling far more current that we will ever be able to load them with in a Servo/Rx environment on ANY size 3D bird. Here, the typical off the shelf R/C wiring, connectors and switches tend to lag significantly behind the newest demand loading capabilities of today’s massive high torque, heavy duty digital servos used at the 33-45% level… Obviously, focus still needs to be applied to the power handling capabilities of modern 3D radio gear in the REALLY big birds.. Finding 22g cabling and tiny industry standard servo connectors on a 200in oz digital servos is laughable. But, that’s what they sell… improved switches and power sharing boards from outfits like SmartFly and Duralite are leading the way and at this writing the new 9100 Series JR power share receivers show promise.. but the point is, power handling and impedance with the LiFe  M1 cells is just not an issue.

*

Q: What about NiMH.. I use the big Sub-C NiMH packs, they have lots more capacity than the A123 packs..

*

Ok, here’s where we get to compare some definitions of ‘rated capacity’ vs ‘usable capacity’. Again, without getting into numbing graphs and finger painting, the short explanation is that we get to use a LOT more of the A123’s rated capacity when compared to NiMH or NiCad. Why? Hugely low internal impedance as the pack discharges..  a marked difference in these vs NiMH or NiCad.. as the pack discharges the impedance does not increase. This means we can use a significantly larger portion of the rated capacity without worrying about those low voltage spikes kicking our Rx’s into failsafe or reset.

*

Next.. Lets look at the emerging Achilles Heel of NiMH for a moment.. longevity and self-discharge. This has been a rats nest of problems.. folks used to NiCads are routinely disappointed by the short cycle and calendar lifespan of NiMH vs NiCad, let alone the self discharge issues. Getting more than a season or two out of them is problematic, if the bird is flown infrequently there’s often issues with dead cells from overdischarge. And for folks running them, the A123M1 is a godsend. There is NO significant self-discharge issue. Charge retention across 9 months in the tests we ran here was 94%. Simply amazing. We’ve not been able to determine yet what the serviceable calendar lifespan is.. duty cycle lifetimes in the electric flight world at insanely high current loads indicate capacity loss is detectable.. but cell serviceability and impedance remains unaffected. In a Giant Scale or 3D 40% application.. I just don’t know what the lifespan limit is yet; but I doknow they’ll outlast any NiCAD, NiMH or LiPoly/LiIon pack.

*

Q: How do they compare to Li-Ion and Li-Poly Rx Packs??.. I’ve been using those with pretty good results so far in my big 3D birds.

*

Aren’t you the lucky one! And, as far as LiPoly goes, I’m convinced that luck has a lot to do with satisfaction and success. At least more of it than I’ve got. The biggest gripe I have against LiPoly is the flame up issue.. closely followed by the dependability issue. The wafer thin plates and cell straps, fragility, vulnerability to vibration alone are enough to keep me away.. add in the need for a regulator and you’ve lost my interest entirely. With LiIon.. high impedance and short longevity and the need for that pesky voltage regulator also keeps them off my table and out of my planes. With Li-Ion, the only way to keep the impedance at a workable level was parallel systems. The weight build up, complexity and short lifesapn (plus the regulators again) leave a lot to be desired. Now we've got something better!

-

Which finally brings us to why I like this cell so much in Giant Scale and IMAC 3D.. it’s robust ability to handle loads, it’s refusal to flame up even when abused, it’s light weight, it’s over-all longevity, it’s seamless transition into aircraft already equipped with conventional LiIon/liPoly or Nicad/NiMH systems. For the LiIon LiPoly guys.. you get to ‘lose’ the regulators, cut the costs in half and at least double or triple the longevity… and get a more dependable system. For the NiCad/NiMH guys, you’ll need a new charger and one new charge port on the plane for each pack.. that’s it. The cost of the charger (about 65 bucks) is offset in the second year.. by not having to replace the packs.

*

Q: Ok, so, where’s the Achilles Heel with LiFe?

*

Mostly in mindset and field habits of folks used to NiCads and NiMH.. Here’s the biggest issue.. load testing. The beasties just don’t react like we expect.. a 1 amp load for 10 seconds will convince somebody not familiar with them that there’s something wrong with the load tester.. the needle won’t sag! I’ve even had guys start melting switch ports and connector housings trying to get enough load on the pack to use an ESV in the tried and true sense. Just doesn’t work. Because of the incredibly flat discharge curve and the ability of the cell to hold voltage while doing 'heavy lifting', using a standing voltage level under load to decide when to recharge can lead to a disaster because when the cells go flat they do so remarkably fast. So, we go to the next question..

*

Q: How do I know when to recharge?

*

This one still gets me smiling.. old codgers like me already know the answer.. the same way we did it before some bright boy came up with the hobby ESV. We fully charge the pack, cycle it to determine capacity. We recharge, fly three or 4 flights, keeping track of the time and the voltage on the pack under the 1 amp load after each flight. At the end of the sessions, we discharge the pack to determine capacity remaining and do a bit of math.. we divide the time by the total capacity used and determine how much air time we can safely expect to get out of the pack.. and then cut that in half.

Some specifics.. the M1 cell rates average 22-2300ma. Voltage drop cliff starts at about 2,000ma. I don’t like to get lower than about 50% remaining before recharging. (I’m a very conservative old codger) My bird used 800ma from the pack in four 10 minute flights (big warbird). I figure I got 5 flights to 50%.. so I field charge on the end of the 4thflight. Yes, I still use the load tester.. and yes, old habits die hard, and checking the voltage between flights is still how I recommend you stay outta surprise territory… but a Load Tester alone is not enough to keep you out of trouble. There are however ways of improving your odds... FMA's Multi4 charger can keep track of relative charge state and VoltMagic can keep track of Peak Low Voltage on board the aircraft.. Here's the discharge graph from VoltMagic on comparative technologies.. this inexpensive device is a godsend for A123 users.   Click here to read more about VoltMagic. 

-

VoltMagic PLV Trigger Points, Various Pack Types
VM.gif
click picture for more detail

Q: How does Nicad or NiMH useable pack capacity compare to A123's? Same flight time for the same capacity?

-

The example plane here is a 1/4 scale warbird equipped originally with a single Sanyo 2400ma 5 cell NiCad pack. Load testing between flights, I’d get 4 flights before the ESV at 1 amp would display under 6v, indicating ‘recharge’ time. Cycling the pack at that point revealed the same amount of ma consumed on average… but that was it for flying the pack. In essence, the NiCad gives up a bit more than half it’s rated capacity before I got to a required recharge point.. the LiFe would go much further.. if it had to. The Nicad wouldn’t. Net effect is seamless to me though.. either way, I was recharging after 4 flights… but carrying significantly more ‘reserve’ useable capacity with the LiFe pack.It must also be mentioned that both Nicad and NiMH INCREASE impedance as they discharge.. the LiFe pack did not.. another significant bonus.

*

Q: Can I use my ‘XYZ’ brand NiCad /NiMH charger or Wall Wart on LiFe?

*

No. Let me be specific… HELL NO! Here’s what’s going on.. LiFe’s nominal voltage per cell is 3.3v. While the charge routine is similar to LiIon or LiPoly, the max allowable voltage under charge is lower than any other Lithium technology cell, usually about 3.6v; so using a standard LiIon or LiPoly charger will do damage. For you NiCad - NiMH guys, the entire charge sub-routine is different . As of now, there are a number of LiFe capable superchargers coming into the marketplace.. these will deal with ‘em as well as the various other types of Lithium and NiCad/NiMH packs but assume my first answer of HELL NO applies until you review your chargers manual. If you not sure, contact the charger mfg or distributor. Don’t let ‘em blow smoke up your backside either. Get it in writing if it’s not called out in the manual.

*

Q: What in heck is the 'Cell Balancer' function all about?

*

Simply put, this monitors voltage of the individual cells and keeps them closely matched or ‘balanced’ in voltage during the charge routine.. Some A123 enthusiasts (and charger MFG's) will try and convince you that A123 packs don’t 'require' balancing. This claim is bunk for those of us that value what we fly... Unbalanced charging may be adequate for a tool pack or a ground application, however the reality of field trials with a wide variety of non-balancing LiFe capable chargers has demonstrated that balance charging is the best way to avoid damage to the pack and reduce risk for the aircraft. Balancing= Good for the pack, good for the plane. See the A123 Setup Guide for how to easily accommodate balance charging at the field.

*

Q: My A123 pack has 2 connectors.. which do I charge thru?

*

 The light gauge wire and connector is the 'cell tap' or 'node' connection.. The heavy gauge wire is the standard pack 'feed' that connects to the switch harness. Don't attempt to hook the 'cell tap' lead to anything BUT the node or celltap port of a balancing charger. This connection is used by balancing chargers that require a seperate three wire connection to the charger in addition to the two wire pack feed to accomplish a balance charge. If your not balance charging, or are charging at high rates, charging should be done on the standard pack feeds as with NiCad and NiMH packs.

 

Q: I have an FMA Charger .. it charges ONLY through a 'node connector'.. do you have an adapter for your 'standard univ' cell tap?

*

Yep.. and I've also made available as a no charge option for the celltap on 2 cell packs the FMA Node Connector. Most folks still wind up ordering the pack with the Univ cell tap and building their own 'extension' or ordering our FMA Node to Univ Cell tap Adapter to make it a bit easier to access the pack for charging via a 'ernst' charge port on the side of the plane. See notes below on how to make an extension from the univ celltap to any brand chargers balance port.

Q: I need to make an adapter cable for my 'Brand X' balancing charger for your 'Univ' cell tap. What are the color codes on your univ tap plug?

*

 The 22g univ tap connector on our two cell packs is very easy to build an adapter for. Using an aileron extension to make an extension/adapter cord is a snap for any charger.. Just snip off the 'male' servo end from the aileron extension and solder a 'pack side' plug that mates with your chargers balance port.. red is pack positive, black (or brown) is pack negative and the white (or yellow) lead is 'node 1' on your balance plug. Another way to explain what that white or yellow lead is relative to the red and black.. it's the 'negative' for the red lead, or the 'positive' for the black lead, allowing the charger to 'see' the individual cell voltage during the charge.

*  

Q: Do I need to ‘balance’ the pack every charge?

*

The only way to avoid costly and aggravating fried battery packs is by using a balance charger EVERY TIME.. Here's the prime issue: A close to fully charged pack, deeply discharged pack or out of balance pack may be easily mis-identified by a 'smart' charger WITH THE WRONG CELL COUNT. The results are usually always a ruined pack. If a quality balancing charger is used and correctly connected, the charger will see the individual cell voltages in the pack, correctly identify it's cell count and usually report on the individual cell voltages all the way through the charge routine. Virtually every pack failure I've seen to date relates back to a 'smart' charger incorrectly identifying the cell count or state of charge of the pack.. with a wiped out pack (at the minimum) being the end result. I Use the FMA Multi-4 and like it's ability to balance charge with just a single 3 wire connection between the pack and the charger.. it reports on individual cell voltages, provides a 'percent of charge' report on the pack at the start of the charge and reports on individual cell voltages at the end of the charge. Knowing and observing individual cell voltages at the start and end of the charge is the only SURE way to determine relative charge state and condition for the pack.

*

Q: What changes do I need to make to charge these in the plane? I’m using HD JR switches.. do I need new ones?

*

Nope.. no new switches required. Two approaches to use here depending on the type of charger you are using. Most balancing chargers use two connections to the pack; a three wire 'balance tap' lead as well as the power feed. Some balance chargers, like FMA's Multi-4, will balance charge with just one connection to the charger. EyebalI the Setup Guide to determine how to take advantage of the simpler 'single 3 wire combo' set up if you have an FMA charger. If your charger requires the dual connection setup, you'll order the pack with a seperate balance tap and seperate power feed. Since virtually every ‘balancer’ equipped charger out there uses a different oddball plug to connect the balance tap to the charger I standardized the packs tap to the industry standard universal servo connector for the balance tap lead.  To connect to the universal balance tap on the pack all you need is an aileron extension with the plug that fits your charger balance port spliced onto the other end. Now, if you balance charge during setup before the first flight of the day, no extra stuff need be added to the plane.. hook the chargers accessory balance lead to the pack tap. The ‘bonus’ part with the ‘standardized’ tap on the pack pops up when you decide to balance charge in the plane with your two-connection charger.. all you need is a ‘ernst’ type chargeport in some convenient spot on the plane and a standard aileron extension from that to the battery balance tap connector... and then you can use the same cable you used to connect directy to the packs tap to plug into the 'ernst' chargeport to connect to the charger. I like simple. A LOT.

*

Q: These are Lithium’s.. don’t lithium’s need a Voltage Regulator for use as a an Rx pack?

*

Once more for you folks out there with LiPoly or LiIon systems.. no regulator is required for modern Rx’s and Servos with these A123 LiFe 2 cell packs... because these packs at full charge and under load are operating at about 6.6v.. the same voltage level as a fully charged and loaded 5 cell 6v NiCad pack. If you have the latest generation 2.4 radio system and digital servo’s rated at 6v and your system exhibits twitching or instability on an A123 2 cell pack then something is wrong with your Rx or Servos.I’ve had folks with 5 cell Nicad packs complain about twitch and jitter with some recent Hitec servos.. these were replaced by Hitec, problem solved. Folks, if your running some dinosaur Rx or antique servos, all bets are off; proceed assuming you’ll be using 4 cell NiCad packs until you upgrade your radio gear. However, if your running anybodys 2.4 Rx system and modern digital servos rated for 6v operation you’ll find the A123’s operate the system perfectly. Rule of thumb, if your running 5 cell 6v Rx packs without regulators, your good to go with A123’s and no regulators.Note: If you’re a Heli pilot with a gyro that won’t operate with a 6v Rx pack, then your outta luck too.

*

Q: I’ve got a DA Engine.. can I use this as an Ignition pack?

*

Yup.. according to DA there are no issues with LiFe packs with their ignition modules. Again, no regulator required. If you’ve got something other than a DA engine with a different ignition module, you’ll need to check with that mfg or distributor; but again, as a rule of thumb, if you’ve had no difficulties running a 5 cell NiCad or NiMH pack on your ignition without a regulator then the A123’s should do just fine. Remember the loaded voltage of LiFe ignition pack is 6.6v.. the same as a fresh NiCad 5 cell pack.

*

Q: How about use for Turbine ECU’s?

*

Since a 2 cell LiFe’s nominal operating voltage under load is @ 6.6v attempting to use them as a drop in replacement can (and likely will) lead to flamer starts and lousy throttle controllability response. We've made available 3 and 4 cell liFe Turbine packs for those folks that need higher voltge for the ECU, as always, check with the ECU/Turbine MFG or Distributor for the required input voltage for their device.

*

Q: I read somewhere that A123 LiFe cells can be charged at up to 10 amps.. does that make sense?

*

Yup.. that’s correct. According to A123’s specs.. 10 amps. Of course, here’s where a brain on the part of the end user comes into play. What are your connectors and switches rated for? If your like me and use HD system switches and industry standard battery and servo connections, then you’d better cut the charge rate down to what those connectors can handle.. 3-4 amps. Tops. If your using direct connections from the pack to the charger via 18g wire and Deans or Anderson connectors, then you can use the 10a charge rate if your charger will go that high. For most of us, the 3 amp rate through the HD switch ports makes sense, and the difference in time (15 min vs 3 minutes for a normal battery refueling at ½ discharge) is of no consequence.

*

Q: I've got a 25% Sized Yak with a DA 50, all digitals and I fly the pants off it.. what A123 LiFe setup would you recommend?

*

Keeping things light is always important.. and in the 25% birds, battery system weights have a bigger percentage of total weight impact than in the larger birds. In your situation a minimum setup would be a single 2300 A123 LiFe pack with dual leads and feeding dual switches. For the Ignition, a single 1100 A123 LiFe pack and with this setup, you'll likely get 3-4 flat out flights between charges at least.. maybe more. See the notes above about how to find out how many flights  you can get with your bird the way you fly it.

*

Q: I’m Running two 2400 Nicad 5 cell packs with dual switches in my 40% Extra.. DA-150 up front. What will I need to upgrade to A123’s?

*

An A123 Charger, a charger cable to connect to your pack or switch, a balancer cable, a servo extension to make your balancer cable out of and a pair of A123 two cell 6.6v 2300 packs. You MIGHT want to pick up a pair of 'ernst' type charge ports for the side of the plane to use the balancer for on-board charging if you don't have the FMA Cellpro or Multi-4 charger.. Note that your CG may change.. this dual pack A123 system will weigh approximately HALF of what the two 5 cell pack NiCad system weighed. For the ignition.. one more as above.. it'll probably run the engine all day.

*

Q: Same Question, same size bird, but I have a single 4500 NiMH 5 cell pack with dual leads & switches and I don't want to lose flying time with the 2300 LiFe's.

*

Same answer as above.. use a Dual 2300 LiFe pack setup with your two switches. You won't lose a bit of flying time.. in fact, you'll probably gain a flight or two and will have improved the dependability a bit to boot without adding a bit of weight.

*

Q: Do I have to buy a new charger?

*

Yes.. Normally. Unless your charger is A123 compatible. There’s a work-around available called the ‘dapter’ to allow safe charging of A123 cells with a NiCad/NiMH charger.. do a quick internet search for this device to see if it fits your needs and will work with your current charger. The feature that I like to see most on a charger used for A123 support is the balance feature.. while there’s likely to be ongoing debate on the need for balancing A123’s with every charge there is at this time no doubt that running a balance charger will prevent charger mishaps that result in fried packs. 

*

Q: Do I need to disconnect the switches from the Rx if charging two packs at the same time like I did with my NiCads and NiMH parallel setups?

*

Ahh... the insidious 'common ground issue'. Yup; chances are; unless your charging through a power box designed to eliminate this issue, then you'll need to unplug one of the switches to eliminate the common ground.

*

Q: I have a standard A123 Charger that won’t ‘cycle’ or discharge. Can I use my programmable NiCad/NiMH charger/cycler (Triton, Triton II, Multiplex LN5014, Accucycle Elite, etc) to discharge them and get capacity numbers for evaluation and testing?

*

Yes.. IF you can set the voltage cutoff on discharge and discharge load, no problem. (most cyclers are programable for low voltage cutoff in the Nicad or NiMH menu's) Again.. this is for cycling for formation or evaluation.. not for charging. The discharge rate should be 1amp, the voltage cutoff should be 2v per cell. See your charger/cyclers manual for how to effect these changes and use an A123 LiFe Compatible Charger to charge A123 LiFe packs.

*

Q: What Charger do you recommend?

*

Lordy.. well; there's an awful lot of chargers out there that'll handle LiFe now.. FMA's Cellpro and Multi-4 are my personal favorites since they accommodate balance charging with just one three wire connection to the pack and with a simple adapter can balance charge, check individual cell voltages and produce a reliable reading on the percentage of charge in the pack right through the switch chargeport. There's a fair number of charger reviews on RCU and plenty of opinions out there.. in my experience, if a pack can be easily checked and balance charged via the switch chargeport, the chance of a pack or charger issue ruining your day are reduced by a potentially dramatic degree. See our Setup Guide for a charger discussion and various setups.

*

Q: Do I need to Formation Charge A123 LiFe packs?

*

Yes.. but in this situation and with these cells the concept of ‘slow’ charge and ‘fast charge’ no longer have the meaning we associate with NiMH and NiCads. The normal formation routine would be WITH the balancer feature in use and the charge rate should be 2 to 3 amps maximum. Use a discharge current of 1 amp, and a discharge cutoff voltage value of 2v per cell. I run 3 charge/discharge routines.. but have had folks tell me no more than one is required. I smile and say “That’s nice.. how much time and money do you have invested in your plane?” Folks, I’m a cautious old codger, and I’ll likely go to the grave that way.. without ever losing a bird to an underperforming battery that was hurried through a break-in process. These are chemical engines.. THAT part of this technology is no different than any other.

Q: What Field Charge rate do you use?

*

I normally field charge at 3 amps.. but that’s the limit of my switches and connectors. When I field charge with the balancer on the first charge of the day, it’s at 2 amps. How you set up and charge is really limited by the connectors and wiring and the charger capabilities. One work-around to speed up charge time with chargers that work at higher rates is to charge the pack directly.. not through the standard system connectors on most chargeport switches. Install an Anderson or Deans connector on the switch input side, order the pack with Anderson or Deans plugs to match and disconnect the pack from the switch and charge through the pack feed.

Q: My NiMH packs are often pretty low after just a couple of days of sitting. Will these (LiFe) hold their charge better?

*

Yup. Lots better. And better than NiCad’s, too. The rapid self discharge characteristic present in low impedance Nicads and NiMH cells is just not present with LiFe cells. BUT.. (there’s always a ‘but’.. you notice?) we are in a brave new world or radio gear and systems applications. In an awful lot of equipment out there I’m finding system loading present at the pack even with the system ‘off’. On some of the 2.4 systems and most ECU’s and some ignition modules there’s a constant current draw of 2-4 milliamps.. so, leaving packs plugged into the switches for weeks or months at a time can cause grief and surprises. I don’t like grief and surprises. I unplug my packs from the switches when I’m done flying. I strongly recommend you do the same. Get in the habit, just do it.

*

Q: How should I store A123 packs?

*

My preferred method is to balance charge and cycle, record the capacity info, then balance charge again and disconnect them from all devices. What these cells DON’T like is discharge to 0 volts under a load and they don’t like sub zero weather conditions. Since they have a very low self discharge characteristic there’s no risk of finding a zero voltage pack in the spring after a winter layup. If you keep your plane in an unheated environment and suffer with sub-zero conditions where the plane is, it would be prudent to take the packs out of the plane and bring them in where you are. Like most batteries, they like the same temperatures you like.

*

Q: What happens when the plane gets hot? My NiMH packs suffer on hot days, I notice lower voltage and capacity. Same when it’s real cold out.

*

Another thing I like about the LiFe’s is the thermal increase performance… these cells are more resilient than any other battery type to temp build-up inside the application it’s powering. A123’s specs indicate routine operating temps as high as 140 degrees with only a 12% drop in capacity. So, if your big bird has a lot of canopy glass cooking your NiMH packs down quickly, LiFe will be a pleasant improvement for you. On the other end of the scale, once the outside temps drop to 4 degrees below zero F we see about 20% loss of capacity. Just in case you like to fly in Alaska in the winter, take a flight or two less than in the summer.

*

Q: Can I get custom electric flight packs from you built out of A123’s?

*

Not without using a gun. I worked for a guy that was a pretty smart feller once.. he used to love to say ‘Just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should’. Over the course of the last 5 years I’ve had a lot of folks tell me ‘I’m missing the boat’ with electrics and electric flight. Gent’s, I built that boat… back when we used to tear down Drill Motors for gearboxes and measure current draw by the amount of smoke coming out the back on the climb out. I have a wall full of trophies and fond memories of the days when ingenuity in electric powered modeling and pilot skill made a bigger difference than the amount of money thrown at the challenge.

-

My current joy in the hobby is The Big Birds.. it’s what I fly when I finally get out to enjoy a day as a modeler. This is my retirement, and what I do is a labor of love.. not a driving grind to rake in the bucks and fleece folks. So, there's no big shop, no leveraged inventory, no staff to supervise, no national ad campaigns, no smoke and mirrors and 'man behind the curtain' crap. It’s just me and my many decades of experience in this narrow field, and that’s the way I like it. Since I'm still working despite the crushed economy, I guess it's how my customers like it too. The amount of work that comes in here from the commercial/military RPV end and the folks flying Giant Scale and IMAC keep me more than busy enough to pay the bills; they are, by the nature of what they are doing and the level of investment in time, effort and craftsmanship they do it with; competent modelers and pilots... and they keep food on the table without driving me batty with ‘is the red wire important’ questions. So, no.. I’ll not be building packs for the electric flight folks in our fine hobby any time soon. Don’t ask, and I promise not to promptly skin you alive and feed the cat with your entrails.

s

Steve Anthony

NoBS Batteries  / Hangtimes Hobbies

October 2008, updated May 2010

email: hangtimes@optonline.net

 

*A123 & Nanophosphate are trademarks of A123 Racing, Inc. All A123 cells and chargers assembled and distributed by Hangtimes Hobbies and NoBS Batteries are acquired from A123's sole licensed US Distributor. All rights to A123 technology and trademarks reserved by A123 Racing Inc